Thoughts, reviews, rants, laments, and general chatting about the wonderful world(s) of comic books.
Showing posts with label Northrop Frye. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Northrop Frye. Show all posts
Feb 19, 2016
The 40 Years of Comics Project - Day 360: The New Defenders #133, July 1984
A few years back I attended the Northrop Frye centenary conference at the University of Toronto. I presented a paper on Superman and typological thought, the last paper presented in a panel at the conference. I had thought I would be the only presenter dealing with comics, but I was pleasantly surprised by one paper that introduced me to this comic.
Now, New Defenders #133 is not a great comic, although writer Peter Gillis is really pretty good at what he does. There's a nice sort of confusion deployed in this story. The Defenders themselves seem to have little idea what's going on, and are pulled in medias res into a smuggling and espionage story. The tale really revolves around Typhoon and Cutlass, "import expediters" whose clients and contacts keep turning up dead. What is quite effective about the story is that the reader experiences the Defenders' confusion in a very fundamental way. While reading the story, I kept asking what was going on, a sentiment echoed by nearly all of the superheroic characters in the piece.
But that's not why, after having heard the paper at the conference, I tracked this issue down. A small interregnum in the comic follows Hank McCoy, aka The Beast, on his lecture tour, which has taken him to Toronto, Ontario. And there, while fending off eager undergrads, he spies the one and only Northrop Frye strolling along the street, and bounces over to him to discuss Blake and the apocalyptic imagination. It's literally a 4 panel interaction, but it definitely shows Gillis' familiarity with Frye's work, and also, perhaps, stands as a testament to his popularity outside of the academy. I'd be hard pressed to think of another literary theorist who's appeared in a mainstream superhero comic.
As I say, it's not the best comic. But is does, for me, at least, represent a very concrete link between the theoretical apparatus that I love and the genre that I cleave to. And so it needed to be in the collection.
Onward!
Dec 23, 2015
The 40 Years of Comics Project - Day 302: 1st Issue Special #1, April 1975
Oh, Jack Kirby. Will you ever be done mining the past for the future?
Say what you will about Kirby, he understands the superhero. His dialogue may be shaky. His plots might verge on the adolescent. Every now and again, he's kind of racist and sexist. (I'm really selling you on him, right?) But his artwork is always, always, gorgeous, and his conception of the superhero as god is sophisticated and beautiful, if occasionally naive.
After finishing this comic, I looked to see where the story continues, and it turns out that it doesn't. I had a quick look through the 1st Issue Special entries at the GCD, and from the looks of things not many of them got a second glance. I'm surprised that this Kirby creation didn't, but the mid-Seventies is moving into his more grounded Marvel work, so perhaps the gods were being put on hold in that decade. Considering that Howard the Duck makes his debut not to much later into the decade perhaps upholds this notion.
The other thing that may have kept the series from continuing is its "meh" factor. There's nothing new here, even for a comic that is drawing on mythology. We have a child, orphaned by evil raiders. We have a quest for vengeance, pursued by a heroic altruist. We have a lizard-like antagonist. Kirby seems to me to have been a champion of the Platonic notion of the outer appearance reflecting the inner nature of a person. His villains are always ugly and disgusting, his heroes always 50s movie star pretty. Frye notes that myth, in its underlying of literature, is akin to geometrical objects as underlying visual art - I think the problem with this story is that the underlying geometry is just too obvious, and the flourishes that one desires in these mythic variations are too thin to conceal the foundation upon which the story is built.
That does it for my recent dollar bin finds. Some Christmas stuff for the next few days. See you then.
Apr 16, 2015
The 40 Years of Comics Project - Day 51: 1602 #5, February 2004
I broke one of my most sacred rules with regards to comics yesterday. I looked at the solicitation and preview information for "Secret Wars." I only mention this because it's in some ways pertinent to something I want to address from today's comic.
But before we get to that, I'll say that the story is really gripping me now. I finished reading this issue today and was unhappy that I'd have to wait until tomorrow to read the next one. (I know, I don't have to, but this is that discipline thing I mentioned a few weeks back, right?) 1602, perhaps a bit surprisingly, is actually a Nick Fury story. I hadn't really put that one together on previous readings of the series, but he's the fulcrum about which the whole story is turning. Not to say that he's necessarily the most important person to the events that are taking place in early modern London, but he's the focal character through which we're witnessing the unfurling of events. I've never been a huge fan of Fury, though in many respects I think that's because I've read only a few comics that really did a good job with him. Most of the time, for me at least, he's been a background player in a world filled with far more colourful costumes. Which is, of course, exactly how Fury would like it. But then you read something like this, or more ideally, the Secret Warriors series, which demonstrates just how well Fury actually fits into this world. (And, as an aside, I'm pretty sure that the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. television series is gearing up to adapt Secret Warriors, and if they do, it'll be amazing.)
I mentioned something I wanted to address about this comic. It's the first page. As a reader of superhero comics, one has to become inured to the recaps that are a fundamental part of superhero storytelling. So to find one done in the creative way that the one in this issue is done is kind of cool:
It doesn't take up story space within the story, it just lays out the characters and situations about which we need to be aware. I can't remember off the top of my head whether or not this was done because the issues were shipping late. The publication dates in the indicia don't indicate that, but that doesn't mean that the series wasn't late in a few places.
I think, however, that this page was added for a different reason. The first sentence from Gaiman's mouth (so to speak) is "We are in the Marvel Universe." He continues with "It's 400 yeas ago. For reasons we do not yet understand, people and events are coming into existence at the wrong time." Further down, Kubert's avatar asks "Hey, Neil, if this is the Marvel Universe, what are all the tiny dinosaurs doing?" My concern with the story, then, is that up to this point there's no indication that the tale is meant to be set in the regular continuity of the Marvel U. It reads far more like one of DC's "Elseworlds" stories, or an extended "What If" tale. Placing it in the main Marvel U makes the story far more interesting, of course, but surely there must have been some way for a writer with as much facility as Gaiman to tell us this without having to step in and basically blurt it out. In fact, had we been able to understand this from the get go, the four issues that precede this one would have had an added depth. The problem is that, as I've noted in the last four posts, there are historical events, aside from the appearance of the Marvel characters, that simply do not jibe with the events of "actual" history, and this pulls us from the notion that all this is happening in the main Marvel U.
So why is this page here, then?
Part of me wonders if maybe there was an editorial intervention that asked Gaiman to place his story in the mainstream continuity in order that Marvel could wring a bit more prestige out of having him write for them. Rather than a one-off "What If" tale, all of a sudden superstar writer Neil Gaiman is telling a cataclysmic story of the main Marvel Universe. I like to think this is not the case, that it was Gaiman's intent all along, but knowing what I do about the way that the editorial oversight of the comics industry functions, I would not be surprised if this was exactly that kind of intervention.
For myself, I choose to ignore this page. I don't need this story to be set in the main Marvel U for it to be a good story. In fact, separating it from that continuity makes it a story. By this, I mean that it has a beginning, a middle, and an end, and that kind of containment of narrative is something that Gaiman himself once argued for in ending The Sandman. I've also noted Frye's complaint about comic strip characters, that they live on in a deathless state, another way of saying that the process of narrative must have that kind of containment. That said, the ones that don't, which really are only serialized superhero comics and religious narratives, move off into the direction of typological reading. But that's a topic for a dissertation (and will be soon.)
The last question I'll pose, and perhaps those who read this blog might know, is to ask whether or not this page shows up in the collected edition of the series? It would serve no purpose other than to shift the setting in a collection, which would be extremely jarring. I'll have to flip through a copy next time I'm at the comic store.
See you tomorrow.
Mar 3, 2015
Re-Entering the Garden: Late Mythic Work in Jack Kirby’s Devil Dinosaur
An article I wrote for Sequart about a couple of issues of Jack Kirby's Devil Dinosaur.
Re-Entering the Garden: late Mythic Work in Jack Kirby's Devil Dinosaur
Re-Entering the Garden: late Mythic Work in Jack Kirby's Devil Dinosaur
Nov 29, 2012
Up In The Sky: Literary Typology and All Star Superman
In June of 2009, I posted an essay on this blog called Up In The Sky: Moses, Jesus, and Superman. It was a topic that caught my attention very early in on in my revamped academic career, and stuck with me all the way to graduate school. This past August, I defended my Master's thesis, entitled "Up In The Sky: Literary Typology and All-Star Superman." It grew directly from that early work in my undergrad. The whole thesis is available from the McMaster Digital Commons. It's fairly long, but if your interests tend this way, I like to think it's a pretty good read.
But I might be biased ;).
Up In The Sky: Literary Typlogy and All-Star Superman
But I might be biased ;).
Up In The Sky: Literary Typlogy and All-Star Superman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



